|

1.xiii A Complete Alphabetical List of Section 1 Selections

1 Leave a comment on paragraph 1 0 Aarseth, Espen. 1997. “Introduction.” In Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature, 1–23. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

2 Leave a comment on paragraph 2 0 Althusser, Louis. 1971. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes Towards an Investigation).” In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, translated by Ben Brewster, 127–86. New York: Monthly Review Press.

3 Leave a comment on paragraph 3 0 Ancient World Mapping Center, Stoa Consortium, and Institute for the Study of the Ancient World. 2000. Pleiades. http://pleiades.stoa.org/.

4 Leave a comment on paragraph 4 0 Andersen, Christian Ulrik, and Søren Bro Pold. 2014. “Post-digital Books and Disruptive Literary Machines.” Formules/Revue des Créations Formelles et Littératures à Contraintes 18: 169–88.

5 Leave a comment on paragraph 5 0 Ang, Ien. 2004. “Who Needs Cultural Research?” In Cultural Studies and Practical Politics: Theory, Coalition Building, and Social Activism, edited by Pepi Leystina, 477–83. New York: Blackwell.

6 Leave a comment on paragraph 6 0 Arbuckle, Alyssa, and Alex Christie, with the ETCL, INKE, and MVP Research Groups. 2015. “Intersections Between Social Knowledge Creation and Critical Making.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (3): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/200.

7 Leave a comment on paragraph 7 0 Arbuckle, Alyssa, Constance Crompton, and Aaron Mauro. 2014. Introduction: “Building Partnerships to Transform Scholarly Publishing.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (4): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/195.

8 Leave a comment on paragraph 8 0 Arbuckle, Alyssa, Aaron Mauro, and Lynne Siemens. 2015. Introduction: “From Technical Standards to Research Communities: Implementing New Knowledge Environments Gatherings, Sydney 2014 and Whistler 2015.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (2): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/232.

9 Leave a comment on paragraph 9 0 Avila, Maria, with contributions from Alan Knoerr, Nik Orlando, and Celestina Castillo. 2010. “Community Organizing Practices in Academia: A Model, and Stories of Partnerships.” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 14 (2): 37–63. http://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/index.php/jheoe/article/view/43/38.

10 Leave a comment on paragraph 10 0 Bachelard, Gaston. 1969. The Poetics of Space. Translated by Maria Jolas. Boston: Beacon Press.

11 Leave a comment on paragraph 11 0 Bailey, Moya Z. 2011. “All the Digital Humanists Are White, All the Nerds Are Men, But Some of Us Are Brave.” Journal of Digital Humanities 1 (1): n.p. http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-1/all-the-digital-humanists-are-white-all-the-nerds-are-men-but-some-of-us-are-brave-by-moya-z-bailey/.

12 Leave a comment on paragraph 12 0 Ball, John Clement. 2010. “Definite Article: Graduate Student Publishing, Pedagogy, and the Journal as Training Ground.” Canadian Literature 204: 160–62.

13 Leave a comment on paragraph 13 0 Balsamo, Anne. 2011. Introduction: “Taking Culture Seriously in the Age of Innovation.” In Designing Culture: The Technological Imagination at Work, 2–25. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

14 Leave a comment on paragraph 14 0 Bath, Jon, and Scott Schofield. 2015. “The Digital Book.” In The Cambridge Companion to the History of the Book, edited by Leslie Howsam, 181–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

15 Leave a comment on paragraph 15 0 Bazerman, Charles. 1991. “How Natural Philosophers Can Cooperate: The Literary Technology of Coordinated Investigation in Joseph Priestley’s History and Present State of Electricity (1767).” In Textual Dynamics of the Professions: Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities, edited by Charles Bazerman and James Paradis, 13–44. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

16 Leave a comment on paragraph 16 0 Benkler, Yochai. 2003. “Freedom in the Commons: Towards a Political Economy of Information.” Duke Law Journal 52 (6): 1245–76. http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol52/iss6/3.

17 Leave a comment on paragraph 17 0 Berkenkotter, Carol, Thomas N. Huckin, and John Ackerman. 1991. “Social Context and Socially  Constructed Texts: The Initiation of a Graduate Student into a Writing Research Community.” In Textual Dynamics of the Professions: Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities, edited by Charles Bazerman and James Paradis, 191–215. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

18 Leave a comment on paragraph 18 0 Berry, David M. 2011. “The Computational Turn: Thinking About the Digital Humanities.” Culture Machine 12: n.p. http://www.culturemachine.net/index.php/cm/article/view/440/470.

19 Leave a comment on paragraph 19 0 —. 2012. “The Social Epistemologies of Software.” Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy 26 (3–4): 379–98. doi:10.1080/02691728.2012.727191.

20 Leave a comment on paragraph 20 0 Besser, Howard. 2004. “The Past, Present, and Future of Digital Libraries.” In A Companion to Digital Humanities, edited by Susan Schreibman, Raymond Siemens, and John Unsworth, 557–75. Oxford: Blackwell.

21 Leave a comment on paragraph 21 0 Biagioli, Mario. 2002. “From Book Censorship to Academic Peer Review.” Emergences 12 (1): 11–45. doi:10.1080/1045722022000003435.

22 Leave a comment on paragraph 22 0 Bijker, Wiebe E., and John Law. 1992. “General Introduction.” In Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law, 1–14. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

23 Leave a comment on paragraph 23 0 Bolter, Jay David. 2007. “Digital Media and Art: Always Already Complicit?” Criticism 49 (1): 107–18. doi:10.1353/crt.2008.0013.

24 Leave a comment on paragraph 24 0 Boot, Peter. 2012. “Literary Evaluation in Online Communities of Writers and Readers.” Scholarly and Research Communication 3 (2): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/77/90.

25 Leave a comment on paragraph 25 0 Borgman, Christine L. 2007. Scholarship in  the  Digital Age:  Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

26 Leave a comment on paragraph 26 0 Bourdieu, Pierre. 1993. “The Field of Cultural Production, or: The Economic World Reversed.” In The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature, edited and translated by Randal Johnson, 29–73. New York: Columbia University Press.

27 Leave a comment on paragraph 27 0 Bowen, William R., Constance Crompton, and Matthew Hiebert. 2014. “Iter Community: Prototyping an Environment for Social Knowledge Creation and Communication.” Scholarly and Research Communication. 5 (4): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/193/360.

28 Leave a comment on paragraph 28 0 Brant, Claire. 2011. “The Progress of Knowledge in the Regions of Air?: Divisions and Disciplines in Early Ballooning.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 45 (1): 71–86. doi:10.1353/ecs.2011.0050.

29 Leave a comment on paragraph 29 0 Brooks, Kevin. 2002. “National Culture and the First-Year English Curriculum: A Historical Study of ‘Composition’ in Canadian Universities.” American Review of Canadian Studies 32 (4): 673–94. doi:10.1080/02722010209481679.

30 Leave a comment on paragraph 30 0 Brown, David W. 1995. “The Public/Academic Disconnect.” In Higher Education Exchange Annual, 38–42. Dayton, OH: Kettering Foundation.

31 Leave a comment on paragraph 31 0 Buehl, Jonathan, Tamar Chute, and Anne Fields. 2012. “Training in the Archives: Archival Research as Professional Development.” College Composition and Communication 64 (2): 274–305.

32 Leave a comment on paragraph 32 0 Burdick, Anne, Johanna Drucker, Peter Lunenfeld, Todd Presner, and Jeffrey Schnapp. 2012. “The Social Life of the Digital Humanities.” In Digital_ Humanities, 73–98. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

33 Leave a comment on paragraph 33 0 Burke, Peter. 2000. A Social History of Knowledge: From Gutenberg to Diderot. Cambridge: Polity Press.

34 Leave a comment on paragraph 34 0 —. 2012. A Social History of Knowledge II: From the Encyclopédie to Wikipedia. Cambridge: Polity Press.

35 Leave a comment on paragraph 35 0 Cao, Qilin, Yong Lu, Dayong Dong, Zongming Tang, and Yongqiang Li. 2013. “The Roles of Bridging and Bonding in Social Media Communities.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (8): 1671–81. doi:10.1002/asi.22866.

36 Leave a comment on paragraph 36 0 Carletti, Laura, Derek McAuley, Dominic Price, Gabriella Giannachi, and Steve Benford. 2013. “Digital Humanities and Crowdsourcing: An Exploration.” Museums and the Web 2013 Conference. Portland: Museums and the Web LLC. http://mw2013.museumsandtheweb.com/paper/digital-humanities-and-crowdsourcing-an-exploration-4/.

37 Leave a comment on paragraph 37 0 Carlton, Susan Brown. 1995. “Composition as a Postdisciplinary Formation.” Rhetoric Review 14 (1): 78–87. doi:10.1080/07350199509389053.

38 Leave a comment on paragraph 38 0 Causer, Tim, and Melissa Terras. 2014. “Crowdsourcing Bentham: Beyond the Traditional Boundaries of Academic History.” International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 8 (1): 46–64. doi:10.3366/ijhac.2014.0119.

39 Leave a comment on paragraph 39 0 Causer, Tim, Justin Tonra, and Valerie Wallace. 2012. “Transcription Maximized; Expense Minimized? Crowdsourcing and Editing The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities (formerly Literary and Linguistic Computing) 27 (2): 119–37. doi:10.1093/llc/fqs004.

40 Leave a comment on paragraph 40 0 Causer, Tim, and Valerie Wallace. 2012. “Building a Volunteer Community: Results and Findings from Transcribe Bentham.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 6 (2): n.p. http://digitalhumanities.org:8081/dhq/vol/6/2/000125/000125.html.

41 Leave a comment on paragraph 41 0 Chapman, Owen, and Kim Sawchuk. 2015. “Creation-as-Research: Critical Making in Complex Environments.” RACAR: Revue d’art canadienne / Canadian Art Review 40 (1): 49–52. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24327426.

42 Leave a comment on paragraph 42 0 Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. 2004. “On Software, or the Persistence of Visual Knowledge.” Grey Room 18: 26–51. doi:10.1162/1526381043320741.

43 Leave a comment on paragraph 43 0 Christie, Alex, and the INKE and MVP Research Groups. 2014.“Interdisciplinary, Interactive, and Online: Building Open Communication Through Multimodal Scholarly Articles and Monographs.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (4): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/190.

44 Leave a comment on paragraph 44 0 Clement, Tanya. 2011. “Knowledge Representation and Digital Scholarly Editions in Theory and Practice.” Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative 1: n.p. doi:10.4000/jtei.203.

45 Leave a comment on paragraph 45 0 Cohen, Daniel J. 2008. “Creating Scholarly Tools and Resources for the Digital Ecosystem: Building Connections in the Zotero Project.’” First Monday 13 (8): n.p. doi:10.5210/fm.v13i8.2233.

46 Leave a comment on paragraph 46 0 —. 2012. “The Social Contract of Scholarly Publishing.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew K. Gold, 319–21. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/27.

47 Leave a comment on paragraph 47 0 Cohen, Daniel J., and Tom Scheinfeldt. 2013. “Preface.” In Hacking the Academy: New Approaches to Scholarship and Teaching from Digital Humanities, edited by Daniel J. Cohen and Tom Scheinfeldt, 3–5. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. doi:10.3998/dh.12172434.0001.001.

48 Leave a comment on paragraph 48 0 Crompton, Constance, Raymond G.  Siemens,  and  Alyssa  Arbuckle,  with the INKE Research Group. 2015. “Enlisting ‘Vertues Noble & Excelent’: Behavior, Credit, and Knowledge Organization in the Social Edition.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 9 (2): n.p. http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/2/000202/000202.html.

49 Leave a comment on paragraph 49 0 Davidson, Cathy N., and David Theo Goldberg. 2004. “Engaging the Humanities.” Profession: 42–62. doi:10.1632/074069504X26386.

50 Leave a comment on paragraph 50 0 De Roure, David. 2014. “The Future of Scholarly Communications.” Insights 27 (3): 233–38. doi:10.1629/2048–7754.171.

51 Leave a comment on paragraph 51 0 Drucker, Johanna. 2009. “From Digital Humanities to Speculative Computing.” In SpecLab: Digital Aesthetics and Projects in Speculative Computing, 3–18. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

52 Leave a comment on paragraph 52 0 —. 2011. “Humanities Approaches to Interface Theory.” Culture Machine 12: 1–20. http://www.culturemachine.net/index.php/cm/article/viewArticle/434.

53 Leave a comment on paragraph 53 0 —. 2012. “Humanistic Theory and Digital Scholarship.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew K. Gold, 85–95. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/34.

54 Leave a comment on paragraph 54 0 Eagleton, Terry. 2010. “The Rise of English.” In The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism, edited by Vincent B. Leitch, 2140–46. New York: W.W. Norton.

55 Leave a comment on paragraph 55 0 Edwards, Charlie. 2012. “The Digital Humanities and Its Users.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew K. Gold, 213–32. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press. http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/31.

56 Leave a comment on paragraph 56 0 Ellison, Julie. 2008. “The Humanities and the Public Soul.” Antipode 40 (3): 463–71.  doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00615.x.

57 Leave a comment on paragraph 57 0 Ellison, Julie, and Timothy Eatman. 2008. Scholarship in Public: Knowledge Creation and Tenure Policy in the Engaged University. Syracuse, NY: Imagining America. http://imaginingamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/TTI_FINAL.pdf.

58 Leave a comment on paragraph 58 0 Farland, Maria M. 1996. “Academic Professionalism and the New Public Mindedness.” Higher Education Exchange Annual: 51–57. http://www.unz. org/Pub/HigherEdExchange-1996q1–00051.

59 Leave a comment on paragraph 59 0 Fisher, Caitlin. 2015. “Mentoring Research-Creation: Secrets, Strategies, and Beautiful Failures.” RACAR: Revue d’art canadienne / Canadian Art Review 40 (1):  46–49.  http://www.jstor.org/stable/24327425.

60 Leave a comment on paragraph 60 0 Fitzpatrick, Kathleen. 2007. “CommentPress: New (Social)  Structures  for New (Networked) Texts.” Journal of Electronic Publishing 10 (3): n.p. doi:10.3998/3336451.0010.305.

61 Leave a comment on paragraph 61 0  —. 2010. “Peer-To-Peer  Review  and   the   Future  of   Scholarly Authority.” Cinema Journal 48 (2): 124–29. doi:10.1353/cj.0.0095.

62 Leave a comment on paragraph 62 0 —. 2011. Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy. New York: New York University Press. (“Introduction: Obsolescence,” 1–14, and Chapter 3: “Texts,” 89–120, are accessible at http://raley.english.ucsb.edu/wp-content2/uploads/234/Fitzpatrick.pdf.)

63 Leave a comment on paragraph 63 0 —. 2012a. “Beyond Metrics:  Community  Authorization  and  Open Peer Review.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew Gold, 452–59. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/7.

64 Leave a comment on paragraph 64 0 —. 2012b. “The Humanities, Done Digitally.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew K. Gold, 12–15. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota    Press.     http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/30.

65 Leave a comment on paragraph 65 0 Fjällbrant, Nancy. 1997. “Scholarly Communication—Historical Development and New Possibilities.” In Proceedings of the IATUL Conferences. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Libraries e-Pubs. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1389&context=iatul.

66 Leave a comment on paragraph 66 0 Flanders, Julia. 2005. “Detailism, Digital Texts, and the Problem of Pedantry.” TEXT Technology 14 (2): 41–70. http://texttechnology.mcmaster.ca/pdf/vol14_2/flanders14-2.pdf.

67 Leave a comment on paragraph 67 0 —. 2009. “The Productive Unease of 21st-Century Digital Scholarship.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 3 (3): n.p. http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/3/3/000055/000055.html.

68 Leave a comment on paragraph 68 0 —. 2012. “Time, Labor, and ‘Alternate Careers’ in Digital Humanities Knowledge Work.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew Gold, 292–308. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/26.

69 Leave a comment on paragraph 69 0 Franklin, Michael J., Donald Kossman, Tim Kraska, Sukriti Ramesh, and Reynold Xin. 2011. “CrowdDB: Answering Queries with Crowdsourcing.” In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOND/PODS ’11), 61–72. New York: ACM.

70 Leave a comment on paragraph 70 0 Fraser, Nancy. 1990. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text (25, 26): 56–80. http://www.jstor.org/stable/466240.

71 Leave a comment on paragraph 71 0 Freeman, Jo. 1972. “The Tyranny of Structurelessness.” The Second Wave 2 (1): n.p.   http://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm.

72 Leave a comment on paragraph 72 0 Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Alan Sheridan. London: Allen Lane and Penguin Books.

73 Leave a comment on paragraph 73 0 Garson, Marjorie. 2008. “ACUTE: The First Twenty-Five Years, 1957–1982.” English Studies in Canada 34 (4): 21–43. https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/ESC/article/view/19771/15285.

74 Leave a comment on paragraph 74 0 Gitelman, Lisa. 2006. Always Already New: Media, History, and the Data of Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

75 Leave a comment on paragraph 75 0 Ghosh, Arpita, Satyen Kale, and Preston McAfee. 2011. “Who Moderates the Moderators? Crowdsourcing Abuse Detection in User-Generated Content.” In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC’ 11), 167–76. New York: ACM.

76 Leave a comment on paragraph 76 0 Graff, Gerald. 1987. Professing Literature: An Institutional History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

77 Leave a comment on paragraph 77 0 —. 2008. “Introduction: In the Dark All Eggheads Are Gray.” In Clueless in Academe: How Schooling Obscures the Life of the Mind, 1–16. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

78 Leave a comment on paragraph 78 0 Gregory, Derek. 1994. Geographical Imaginations. Oxford: Blackwell.

79 Leave a comment on paragraph 79 0 Guédon, Jean-Claude. 2008. “Digitizing and the Meaning of Knowledge.” Academic Matters (October–November): 23–26. http://www.academicmatters.ca/assets/AM_SEPT’08.pdf.

80 Leave a comment on paragraph 80 0 Guldi, Jo. 2013. “Reinventing the Academic Journal.” In Hacking the Academy: New Approaches to Scholarship and Teaching from Digital Humanities, edited by Daniel J. Cohen and Tom Scheinfeldt, 19–24. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. doi:10.3998/dh.12172434.0001.001.

81 Leave a comment on paragraph 81 0 Guldi, Jo, and Cora Johnson-Roberson. 2012. Paper Machines. metaLAB @ Harvard.      http://papermachines.org/.

82 Leave a comment on paragraph 82 0 Habermas, Jürgen. 1991. “Introduction: Preliminary Demarcation of a Type of Bourgeois Public Sphere.” In The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, translated by Thomas Burger with the assistance of Frederick Lawrence, 1–26. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

83 Leave a comment on paragraph 83 0 Haft, Jamie. 2012. “Publicly Engaged Scholarship in the Humanities, Arts, and Design.” Animating Democracy: 1–15. http://imaginingamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/JHaft-Trend-Paper.pdf.

84 Leave a comment on paragraph 84 0 Hart, Jennefer, Charlene Ridley, Faisal Taher, Corina Sas, and Alan J. Dix. 2008. “Exploring the Facebook Experience: A New Approach to Usability.” In Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI08), 471–74. New York: ACM.

85 Leave a comment on paragraph 85 0 Hart, William, and Terry Marsh. 2014. “Social Media Research Foundation.” In Encyclopedia of Social Media and Politics, edited by Kerric Harvey, 3: 1173–74. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

86 Leave a comment on paragraph 86 0 Hayles, N. Katherine. 2008. Electronic Literature: New Horizons for the LiteraryNotre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

87 Leave a comment on paragraph 87 0 Haraway, Donna. 1990. “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century.” In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, 149–81. New York: Routledge.

88 Leave a comment on paragraph 88 0 Heidegger, Martin.  1982.  “The  Question  Concerning  Technology.”  In The Question Concerning Technology and Other Questions, translated with an introduction by William Lovitt, 3–35. New York: Harper Perennial.

89 Leave a comment on paragraph 89 0 Hendry, David G., J.R. Jenkins, and Joseph F. McCarthy. 2006. “Collaborative Bibliography.” Information Processing & Management 42 (3): 805–25. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2005.05.007.

90 Leave a comment on paragraph 90 0 Holley, Rose. 2010. “Crowdsourcing: How and Why Should Libraries Do It?”ib Magazine 16 (3/4): n.p. doi:10.1045/march2010–holley.

91 Leave a comment on paragraph 91 0 Huffman, Steve, and Alexis Ohanian. 2005. Reddit. https://www.reddit.com.

92 Leave a comment on paragraph 92 0 Introna, Lucas D., and Helen Nissenbaum. 2000. “Shaping the Web: Why the Politics of Search Engines Matters.” The Information Society 16 (3): 169–85.

93 Leave a comment on paragraph 93 0 Inversini, Alessandro, Rogan Sage, Nigel Williams, and Dimitrios Buhalis. 2015. “The Social Impact of Events in Social Media Conversation.” In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2015, edited by Iis Tussyadiah and Alessandro Inversini, 283–94. Lugano, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

94 Leave a comment on paragraph 94 0 Ittersum, Martine J. van. 2011. “Knowledge Production in the Dutch Republic: The Household Academy of Hugo Grotius.” Journal of the History of Ideas 72 (4): 523–48. doi:10.1353/jhi.2011.0033.

95 Leave a comment on paragraph 95 0 Jagodzinski, Cecile M.  2008.  “The University Press in  North America: A Brief History.” Journal of Scholarly Publishing 40 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1353/ scp.0.0022.

96 Leave a comment on paragraph 96 0 Jankowski, Nicholas W., Andrea Scharnhorst, Clifford Tatum, and Zuotian Tatum. 2013. “Enhancing Scholarly Publications: Developing Hybrid Monographs in the Humanities and Social Sciences.” Scholarly and Research Communication 4 (1): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/40/123.

97 Leave a comment on paragraph 97 0 Jay, Gregory. 2012. “The Engaged Humanities: Principles and Practices for Public Scholarship and Teaching.” Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship 3 (1): 51–63. http://imaginingamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/jay-publichumanities.pdf.

98 Leave a comment on paragraph 98 0 Jenstad, Janelle, and Kim McLean-Fiander. n.d. “The MoEML Gazetteer of Early Modern London.” The Map of Early Modern London, edited by Janelle Jenstad. Victoria: University of Victoria. http://mapoflondon.uvic.ca/gazetteer_about.htm.

99 Leave a comment on paragraph 99 0 Jessop, Martyn. 2008. “Digital Visualization as a Scholarly Activity.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities (formerly Literary and Linguistic Computing) 23 (3): 281–93. doi:10.1093/llc/fqn016.

100 Leave a comment on paragraph 100 0 Johns, Adrian. 1998. The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

101 Leave a comment on paragraph 101 0 Jones, Steven E. 2013a. The Emergence of the Digital Humanities. London and New York: Routledge.

102 Leave a comment on paragraph 102 0 —. 2013b. “Publications.” In The Emergence of the Digital Humanities, 147–77. London and New York: Routledge.

103 Leave a comment on paragraph 103 0 Kaufer, David S., and Kathleen M. Carley. 1993. “Academia.” In Communication at a Distance: The Influence of Print on Sociocultural Organization and Change, 341–93. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

104 Leave a comment on paragraph 104 0 Kingsley, Danny. 2013. “Build It and They Will Come? Support for Open Access in Australia.” Scholarly and Research Communication 4 (1): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/viewFile/39/121.

105 Leave a comment on paragraph 105 0 Kirschenbaum, Matthew. 2012a. “Digital Humanities As/Is a Tactical Term.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew K. Gold, 415–28. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/48.

106 Leave a comment on paragraph 106 0 —. 2012b.  “What is Digital Humanities and What’s It Doing in English Departments?” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew K. Gold, 3–11. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/38.

107 Leave a comment on paragraph 107 0 Kittur, Aniket, and Robert E. Kraut. 2008. “Harnessing the Wisdom of the Crowds in Wikipedia: Quality Through Coordination.” In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 08), 37–46. New York: ACM.

108 Leave a comment on paragraph 108 0 Kjellberg, Sara. 2010. “I am a Blogging Researcher: Motivations for Blogging in a Scholarly Context.” First Monday 15 (8): n.p. doi:10.5210/fm.v15i8.2962.

109 Leave a comment on paragraph 109 0 Lane, Richard J. 2014. “Innovation through Tradition: New Scholarly Publishing Applications Modelled on Faith-Based Electronic Publishing and Learning Environments.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (4): http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/188.

110 Leave a comment on paragraph 110 0 Latour, Bruno. 2009. “A Cautious Prometheus? A Few Steps Towards a Philosophy of Design (with Special Attention to Peter Sloterdijk).” In Networks of Design: Proceedings of the 2008 Annual International Conference of the Design History Society, edited by Fiona Hackne, Jonathan Glynne, and Viv Minto, 2–10. Boca Raton, FL: Universal Publishers.

111 Leave a comment on paragraph 111 0 Lessig, Lawrence. 2004. Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. New York: Penguin.

112 Leave a comment on paragraph 112 0 Lightman, Harriet, and Ruth N. Reingold. 2005. “A Collaborative Model for Teaching E-Resources: Northwestern University’s Graduate Training Day.” Libraries and the Academy 5 (1): 23–32. doi:10.1353/pla.2005.0008.

113 Leave a comment on paragraph 113 0 Liu, Alan. 2004. The Laws of Cool: Knowledge Work and the Culture of Information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

114 Leave a comment on paragraph 114 0 —. 2009. “The End of the End of the Book: Dead Books, Lively Margins, and Social Computing.” Michigan Quarterly Review 48 (4): 499– 520.

115 Leave a comment on paragraph 115 0 —. 2011. “Friending the Past: The Sense of History and Social Computing.” New Literary History: A Journal of Theory and Interpretation 42 (1): 1–30. doi:10.1353/nlh.2011.0004.

116 Leave a comment on paragraph 116 0 —. 2012. “Where is Cultural Criticism in the Digital Humanities?” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew K. Gold, 490–510. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/20.

117 Leave a comment on paragraph 117 0 —. 2013. “From Reading to Social Computing.” In Literary Studies in the Digital Age: An Evolving Anthology, edited by Kenneth M. Price and Raymond G. Siemens, n.p. New York: MLA Commons. https://dlsanthology.commons.mla.org/from-reading-to-social-computing/.

118 Leave a comment on paragraph 118 0 Lorimer, Rowland. 2013. “Libraries, Scholars, and Publishers in Digital Journal and Monograph Publishing.” Scholarly and Research Communication 4 (1): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/viewFile/43/117.

119 Leave a comment on paragraph 119 0 —. 2014. “A Good Idea, a Difficult Reality: Toward a Publisher/ Library Open Access Partnership.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5  (4):  n.p.  http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/180.

120 Leave a comment on paragraph 120 0 Losh, Elizabeth. 2012. “Hacktivism and the Humanities: Programming Protest in the Era of the Digital University.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew K. Gold, 161–86. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.    http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/32.

121 Leave a comment on paragraph 121 0 Manovich, Lev. 2001. The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

122 Leave a comment on paragraph 122 0 —. 2012. “Trending: The Promises and the Challenges of Big Social Data.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew K. Gold, 460–75. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/15.

123 Leave a comment on paragraph 123 0 Manzo, Christina, Geoff Kaufman, Sukdith Punjasthitkul, and Mary Flanagan. 2015. “‘By the People, For the People’: Assessing the Value of Crowdsourced, User-Generated Metadata.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 9 (1): n.p. http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/1/000204/000204.html.

124 Leave a comment on paragraph 124 0 Maxwell, John W. 2014. “Publishing Education in the 21st Century and the Role of the University.” Journal of Electronic Publishing 17 (2): n.p. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jep/3336451.0017.205?view=text;rgn=main.

125 Leave a comment on paragraph 125 0  2015. “Beyond Open Access to Open Publication and Open Scholarship.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (3): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/202.

126 Leave a comment on paragraph 126 0 McCarty, Willard. 2005. Humanities Computing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

127 Leave a comment on paragraph 127 0 McGann, Jerome. The Textual Condition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

128 Leave a comment on paragraph 128 0 —. 2006. “From Text to Work: Digital Tools and the Emergence of the Social Text.” TEXT: An Interdisciplinary Annual of Textual Studies 49–http://www.jstor.org/stable/30227956.

129 Leave a comment on paragraph 129 0 McGillivray, David, Gayle McPherson, Jennifer Jones, and Alison McCandlish. 2016. “Young  People, Digital  Media Making  and Critical Digital Citizenship.” Leisure Studies 35 (6): 724–38. doi:10.1080/02614367.2015.1062041.

130 Leave a comment on paragraph 130 0 McGregor, Heidi, and Kevin Guthrie. 2015. “Delivering Impact of Scholarly Information: Is Access Enough?” Journal of Electronic Publishing 18 (3): n.p. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jep/3336451.0018.302?view=text;rgn=main.

131 Leave a comment on paragraph 131 0 McKinley, Donelle. 2012. “Practical Management Strategies for Crowdsourcing in Libraries, Archives and Museums.”Reportfor the School of Information Management, Faculty of Commerce and Administration, Victoria University of Wellington (New Zealand): n.p. http://nonprofitcrowd.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/McKinley-2012–Crowdsourcingmanagement-strategies.pdf.

132 Leave a comment on paragraph 132 0 McPherson, Tara. 2012. “Why are the Digital Humanities So White? or Thinking the Histories of Race and Computation.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew K. Gold, 139–60. Minnesota: University of Minnesota  Press.  http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/29.

133 Leave a comment on paragraph 133 0 Meadows, Alice. 2015. “Beyond Open: Expanding Access to Scholarly Content.” Journal of Electronic Publishing 18 (3): n.p. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jep/3336451.0018.301?view=text;rgn=main.

134 Leave a comment on paragraph 134 0 Michel, Jean-Baptiste, Yuan Kui Shen, Aviva Presser Aiden, Adrian Veres, Matthew K. Gray, Google Books Team, Joseph P. Pickett, Dale Hoiberg, Dan Clancy, Peter Norvig, Jon Orwant, Steven Pinker, Martin A. Nowak, and Erez Lieberman Aiden. 2011. “Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books.” Science 331 (6014): 176–82. doi:10.1126/ science.1199644.

135 Leave a comment on paragraph 135 0 Moretti, Franco. 1998. Atlas of the European Novel, 1800–1900. London: Verso.

136 Leave a comment on paragraph 136 0 —. 2005. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary HistoryLondon and New York: Verso.

137 Leave a comment on paragraph 137 0 Moyle, Martin, Justin Tonra, and Valerie Wallace. 2011. “Manuscript Transcription by Crowdsourcing: Transcribe Bentham.” Liber Quarterly 20 (3–4): 347–56. doi:10.18352/lq.7999.

138 Leave a comment on paragraph 138 0 Mozilla Foundation. 2011. Open Badges. https://openbadges.org.

139 Leave a comment on paragraph 139 0 Mrva-Montoya, Agata. 2012. “Social Media: New Editing Tools or Weapons of Mass Distraction?” Journal of Electronic Publishing 15 (1): 1–24. doi:10.3998/3336451.0015.103.

140 Leave a comment on paragraph 140 0 Nowviskie, Bethany. 2012a. “A Digital Boot Camp for Grad Students in the Humanities.” The Chronicle of Higher Education. Last modified April 29, 2012. http://chronicle.com/article/A-Digital-Boot-Camp-for-Grad/131665.

141 Leave a comment on paragraph 141 0   —. 2012b. “Evaluating Collaborative Digital Scholarship (or, Where Credit is Due).” Journal of Digital Humanities 1 (4): n.p. http:// journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/evaluating-collaborative-digitalscholarship-by-bethany-nowviskie/.

142 Leave a comment on paragraph 142 0 O’Donnell, Daniel, Heather Hobma, Sandra Cowan, Gillian Ayers, Jessica Bay, Marinus Swanepoel, Wendy Merkley,  Kelaine Devine, Emma  Dering, and  Inge  Genee.  2015.  “Aligning  Open  Access  Publication  with  the Research and Teaching Missions of the Public University: The Case of the Lethbridge Journal Incubator (If ‘if’s and ‘and’s were pots and pans).” Journal of Electronic Publishing 18 (3): n.p.  http://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jep/3336451.0018.309?view=text;rgn=main.

143 Leave a comment on paragraph 143 0 Open Knowledge Foundation. 2009–12. AnnotateIt / Annotator. http://annotateit.org.

144 Leave a comment on paragraph 144 0 OpenStreetMap Foundation. n.d. OpenStreetMap. https://www.openstreetmap.org.

145 Leave a comment on paragraph 145 0 Pearce, Nick, Martin Weller, Eileen Scanlon, and Sam Kinsley. 2010. “Digital Scholarship Considered: How New Technologies Could Transform Academic Work.” Education 16 (1): n.p. http://ineducation.ca/ineducation/article/view/44.

146 Leave a comment on paragraph 146 0 Pfister, Damien Smith. 2011. “Networked Expertise in the Era of Many-toMany Communication: On Wikipedia and Invention.” Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy 25 (3): 217–31. doi:10.1080/0269 1728.2011.578306.

147 Leave a comment on paragraph 147 0 Powell, Daniel, Raymond G. Siemens, and William R. Bowen, with Matthew Hiebert and Lindsey Seatter. 2015. “Transformation through Integration: The Renaissance Knowledge Network (ReKN) and a Next Wave of Scholarly Publication.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (2): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/199.

148 Leave a comment on paragraph 148 0 Powell, Daniel, Raymond G. Siemens, and the INKE Research Group. 2014. “Building Alternative Scholarly Publishing Capacity: The Renaissance Knowledge Network (ReKN) as Digital Production Hub.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (4): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/183.

149 Leave a comment on paragraph 149 0 Ramsay, Stephen, and Geoffrey Rockwell. 2012. “Developing Things: Notes Toward an Epistemology of Building in the Digital Humanities.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew K. Gold, 75–84. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

150 Leave a comment on paragraph 150 0 Ratto, Matt. 2011a. “Critical Making:  Conceptual and  Material Studies in Technology and Social Life.” The Information Society 27 (4): 252–60. doi:10.1080/01972243.2011.583819.

151 Leave a comment on paragraph 151 0 —. 2011b. “Open Design and Critical Making.” In Open Design Now: Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive, edited by Bas van Abel, Lucas Evers, Roel Klaassen, and Peter Troxler, n.p. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers. http://opendesignnow.org/index.php/article/critical-making-matt-ratto/.

152 Leave a comment on paragraph 152 0 Ratto, Matt, and Robert Ree. 2012. “Materializing Information: 3D Printing and Social Change.” First Monday 17 (7): n.p. doi:10.5210/fm.v17i7.3968.

153 Leave a comment on paragraph 153 0 Ratto, Matt, Sara Ann Wylie, and Kirk Jalbert. 2014. “Introduction to the Special Forum on Critical Making as Research Program.” The Information Society 30 (2): 85–95. doi:10.1080/01972243.2014.875767.

154 Leave a comment on paragraph 154 0 Ridge, Mia. 2013. “From Tagging to Theorizing: Deepening Engagement with Cultural Heritage through Crowdsourcing.” Curator: The Museum Journal 56 (4): 435–50. doi:10.1111/cura.12046.

155 Leave a comment on paragraph 155 0 Robinson, Peter. 2010. “Electronic Editions for Everyone.” In Text and Genre in Reconstruction: Effects of Digitalization on Ideas, Behaviours, Products and Institutions, edited by Willard McCarty, 145–63. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.

156 Leave a comment on paragraph 156 0 Rockwell, Geoffrey. 2012. “Crowdsourcing the Humanities: Social Research and Collaboration.” In Collaborative Research in the Digital Humanities, edited by Marilyn Deegan and Willard McCarty, 135–54. Farnham, UK, and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

157 Leave a comment on paragraph 157 0 Rosenzweig, Roy. 2006. “Can History Be Open Source? Wikipedia and the Future of the Past.” Journal of American History 93 (1): 117–46.

158 Leave a comment on paragraph 158 0 Ross, Anthony, and Nadia Caidi. 2005. “Action and Reaction: Libraries in the Post 9/11 Environment.” Library and Information Science Research 27 (1): 97–114.   doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2004.09.006.

159 Leave a comment on paragraph 159 0 Ross, Stephen, Alex Christie, and Jentery Sayers. 2014. “Expert/Crowdsourcing for the Linked Modernisms Project.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5  (4):  n.p.  http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/viewFile/186/368.

160 Leave a comment on paragraph 160 0 Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media (George Mason University). 2007–13. Omeka. http://omeka.org.

161 Leave a comment on paragraph 161 0 Saklofske, Jon, with the INKE Research Group. 2012. “Fluid Layering: Reimagining Digital Literary Archives Through Dynamic, User-GeneratedContent.” Scholarly and Research Communication 3 (4): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/viewFile/70/181.

162 Leave a comment on paragraph 162 0 Saklofske, Jon, and Jake Bruce, with the INKE Modelling and Prototyping Team and the INKE Team. 2013. “Beyond Browsing and Reading: The Open Work of Digital Scholarly Editions.” Scholarly and Research Communication 4  (3):  n.p.  http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/119.

163 Leave a comment on paragraph 163 0 San Martin, Patricia Silvana, Paola  Caroline  Bongiovani,  Ana  Casali, and Claudia Deco. 2015. “Study on Perspectives Regarding Deposit on Open Access Repositories in the Context of Public Universities in the CentralEastern Region of Argentina.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (1): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/145.

164 Leave a comment on paragraph 164 0 Shillingsburg, Peter. 2006. From Gutenberg to Google: Electronic Representations of Literary Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

165 Leave a comment on paragraph 165 0 Siemens, Lynne. 2009. “It’s a Team if You Use ‘Reply All’: An Exploration of Research Teams in Digital Humanities Environments.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities (formerly Literary and Linguistic Computing) 24 (2): 225– 33. doi:10.1093/llc/fqp009.

166 Leave a comment on paragraph 166 0 Siemens, Raymond  G.  2002.  “Scholarly  Publishing  at  its  Source,  and at Present.” In The Credibility of Electronic Publishing: A Report to the Humanities and Social Sciences Federation of Canada, compiled by Raymond Siemens, Michael Best, Elizabeth Grove-White, Alan Burk, James Kerr, Andy Pope, Jean-Claude Guédon, Geoffrey Rockwell, and Lynne Siemens. TEXT Technology 11 (1): 1–128.

167 Leave a comment on paragraph 167 0 Siemens, Raymond G., Meagan Timney, Cara Leitch, Corina Koolen, and Alex Garnett, with the ETCL, INKE, and PKP Research Groups. 2012. “Toward Modeling the Social Edition: An Approach to Understanding the Electronic Scholarly Edition in the Context of New and Emerging Social Media.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities (formerly Literary and Linguistic Computing) 27 (4): 445–61. doi:10.1093/llc/fqs013.

168 Leave a comment on paragraph 168 0 Smith, Martha Nell. 2004. “Electronic Scholarly Editing.” In A Companion to Digital Humanities, edited by Susan Schreibman, Raymond G. Siemens, and John Unsworth, 306–22. Oxford: Blackwell.

169 Leave a comment on paragraph 169 0 Stanford Natural Language Processing Group. 2006. Stanford Named Entity Recognizer (NER). http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/CRF-NER.html.

170 Leave a comment on paragraph 170 0 Stein, Bob. 2015. “Back to the Future.” Journal of Electronic Publishing 18 (2): n.p.   doi:10.3998/3336451.0018.204.

171 Leave a comment on paragraph 171 0 Streeter, Thomas. 2010. “Introduction.” In The Net Effect: Romanticism, Capitalism, and the Internet, 1–16. New York and London: New York University Press.

172 Leave a comment on paragraph 172 0 Svensson, Patrik. 2012. “Beyond the Big Tent.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew K. Gold, 36–49. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.     http://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/22.

173 Leave a comment on paragraph 173 0 Tally, Robert T., Jr. 2013. Spatiality. London and New York: Routledge. Turner, Fred. 2006. From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, theWhole Earth Network,  and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

174 Leave a comment on paragraph 174 0 Vaidhyanathan, Siva. 2002. “The Content-Provider Paradox: Universities in the Information Ecosystem.” Academe 88 (5): 34–37. doi:10.2307/40252219.

175 Leave a comment on paragraph 175 0 Vandendorpe, Christian. 2012. “Wikisource and the Scholarly Book.” Scholarly and Research Communication 3 (4): n.p. http://src-online.ca/src/index.php/src/article/viewFile/58/146. 

176 Leave a comment on paragraph 176 0 —. 2015. “Wikipedia and the Ecosystem of Knowledge.” Scholarly and Research Communication 6 (3): n.p. http://src-online.ca/index.php/src/article/view/201

177 Leave a comment on paragraph 177 0 Van de Sompel, Herbert, Sandy Payette, John Erickson, Carl Lagoze, and Simeon Warner. 2004. “Rethinking Scholarly Communication: Building the System that Scholars Deserve.” D-Lib Magazine 10 (9): n.p. doi:10.1045/september2004-vandesompel.

178 Leave a comment on paragraph 178 0 Van House, Nancy A. 2003. “Digital Libraries and Collaborative Knowledge Construction.” In Digital Library Use: Social Practice in Design and Evaluation, edited by Ann Peterson Bishop, Nancy A. Van House, and Barbara P. Buttenfield, 271–95. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

179 Leave a comment on paragraph 179 0 Vetch, Paul. 2010. “From Edition to Experience: Feeling the Way towards User-Focused Interfaces.” In Electronic Publishing: Politics and Pragmatics, edited  by  Gabriel  Egan,  171–84.  New  Technologies  in  Medieval  and Renaissance Studies 2. Tempe, AZ: Iter Inc., in collaboration with the Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies.

180 Leave a comment on paragraph 180 0 Walsh, Brandon, Claire Maiers, Gwen Nally, Jeremy Boggs, and Praxis Program Team. 2014. “Crowdsourcing Individual Interpretations: Between Microtasking and Multitasking.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities (formerly Literary and Linguistic Computing) 29 (3): 379–86. doi:10.1093/ llc/fqu030.

181 Leave a comment on paragraph 181 0 Wasik, Bill. 2009. And Then There’s This: How Stories Live and Die in Viral Culture. New York: Viking.

182 Leave a comment on paragraph 182 0 Westphal, Bertrand. 2011. Geocriticism: Real and Fictional Spaces. Translated by Robert T. Tally, Jr. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

183 Leave a comment on paragraph 183 0 Wick, Marc (founder), and Christophe Boutreux (developer). GeoNamesMännedorf, Switzerland: Unxos GmbH. http://www.geonames.org.

184 Leave a comment on paragraph 184 0 Williams, George H. 2012. “Disability, Universal Design, and the Digital Hu​manities.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew Gold, 202–12. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. http:// dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/debates/text/44.

185 Leave a comment on paragraph 185 0 Wrisley, David J., and the team at the American University of Beirut. 2016. Linguistic Landscapes of Beirut (formerly Mapping Language Contact in Beirut).   http://llb.djwrisley.com/.

186 Leave a comment on paragraph 186 0 Wylie, Sara Ann, Kirk Jalbert, Shannon Dosemagen, and  Matt  Ratto. 2014. “Institutions for Civic Technoscience: How Critical Making is Transforming Environmental Research.” The Information Society 30 (2): 116–26.  doi:10.1080/01972243.2014.875767.

187 Leave a comment on paragraph 187 0 Zacharias, Robert. 2011. “The Death of the Graduate Student (and the Birth of the HQP).” English Studies in Canada 37 (1): 4–8. https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/ESC/article/view/25197/18694.

Source: https://ntmrs-skc.itercommunity.org/social-knowledge-creation-and-conveyance/complete-alphabetical-list-selections1/